Thanks so much for the excellent work. A quick question for clarification— it seems that some things are lining up for a leg up such as the benign funding rates, options expiry, continued corporate and institutional allocations / integrations etc. But the Pablo move seems to be a conflicting signal of potential intent to manipulate markets downwards in the short term. So my question is: am I misinterpreting Pablo’s move or is it more of a case of conflicting signals that don’t totally line up? Thanks again!
Corporations buying Bitcoin? Saylor and Elon Musk do not count. Corporate treasury teams dare not risk their careers. You can’t be serious that US based Corporations are actually buying, are you? Retail, apes and Tether are buying.
Paid newsletter? Just take my money!
Seriously though, thanks for these free ones, the best newsletter in crypto.
this is absolutely amazing. Thank you
Thanks so much for the excellent work. A quick question for clarification— it seems that some things are lining up for a leg up such as the benign funding rates, options expiry, continued corporate and institutional allocations / integrations etc. But the Pablo move seems to be a conflicting signal of potential intent to manipulate markets downwards in the short term. So my question is: am I misinterpreting Pablo’s move or is it more of a case of conflicting signals that don’t totally line up? Thanks again!
Corporations buying Bitcoin? Saylor and Elon Musk do not count. Corporate treasury teams dare not risk their careers. You can’t be serious that US based Corporations are actually buying, are you? Retail, apes and Tether are buying.
Tether doesn't buy bitcoin.
Does Square count in your methodology? If Oracle "apes in" would that count? Where is your line for deciding when corporations are entering?